Picture
A big gripe voiced by ex-employees settling wrongful termination and discrimination/ retaliation lawsuits is how the settlement check is taxed.  Employers have been granted the option of taxing the check according to the employee's normal tax bracket or based upon the lump sum distribution rate (a whopping 42% of the amount).  When I was a plaintiff attorney, this issue threatened to unravel many potential settlements.  

While not a total fix, there is a least a little reprieve for those resolving complaints before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).  In their December 18, 2012 Latino Express supplemental decision (the initial decision was July 31, 2012, but the Board invited briefing on the issues of taxation and reporting of the backpay award to social security), the Board ruled that the respondent employer should reimburse the complainant (ex) employee of any excess taxes paid on the settlement.  It further ruled that the respondent must report to social security the backpay paid so that the amount can be properly credited to the employee's social security calculation for the appropriate year(s).  

In reality, the huge tax hit on settlements is not too big of a deal, at least not for employees that tend to get tax refund checks.  Even though they pay excess taxes, they tend to get most if not all of it back when it is tax refund time.  But perception typically trumps reality, and when the perception is that the employer is once again sticking it to the poor (ex) employee, it creates additional hard feelings, animosity and hurts otherwise good-faith settlement negotiations between the parties.  So kudos to the NLRB for taking a step in the right direction.  Now hopefully the courts and/or legislature will follow suit.

 


Comments


Comments are closed.

Copyright 2012 WorkplaceDignity. All rights reserved. This blog represents the opinions of the individual author(s) of the respective posts. Any opinions or information expressed here do not represent the opinions, beliefs or expressions of the employer(s) of any author on this site. WorkplaceDignity does not necessarily endorse the opinion(s) expressed by any guest blogger on this site who is not employed by WorkplaceDignity. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. WorkplaceDignity and its owners, bloggers and editors makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis